These are the notes I’ve taken during the talks on the fourth and final day of the 2006 edition of the O’Reilly European Open Source Convention (better known as EuroOSCON 2006).
You can get to the index page for my notes on this conference here.
Speaker: Damian Conway
In Perl6 we have @bitmap = (0) x 256;_ becomes _@bitmap = 0 xx 256; and many other things, but for Perl5 we have List::Maker
for (<@list>)
for (< ^@list> ) (count down)
my @list = <1, 4, ..30: !/13/>; (1 to 30, 3 by 3, but not 13)
my @list = <yada yeda 'hello world' hello>;
my @list = < 46d >;
Extensible by using the add_handler funcion
New version up on CPAN in a day or two
Examples:
use Contextual::return;
sub yada (){
...
if (LIST) return X;
if (ARRAY) return Y;
}
...
return
LIST { @list }
BOOL { 1 }
STR { "hello" }
VOID { die "huh?" }
return FAIL; => if it is called in a BOOLEAN context return undef, else die. This means that open FH 'file'; now dies (as it should) because I’m not checking the return valueSpeaker: Brad Neuberg
Augmenting The Human Intellect - Paper to read (1962!!)
Tools for thinking:
Systems Thinking
Capabilities (all 5 parts of the systems have capabilities)
Look at tools and humans holistically
Technorati Tags: EuroOSCON, EuroOSCON06, EuroOSCON2006
These are the notes I’ve taken during the talks on the third day of the 2006 edition of the O’Reilly European Open Source Convention (better known as EuroOSCON 2006).
You can get to the index page for my notes on this conference here.
Speaker: Peter Saint-Andre
Speaker: Tor Nørretranders
Technorati Tags: EuroOSCON, EuroOSCON06, EuroOSCON2006
These are the notes I’ve taken during the talks on the second day of the 2006 edition of the O’Reilly European Open Source Convention (better known as EuroOSCON 2006).
You can get to the index page for my notes on this conference here.
Speaker: Brian Suda
(missed some of the initial content, must link to slides which are on-line on the speaker’s website)
(Ex: hAtom) If it is in HTML it is easier to later convert it to other things, the semantics are all in HTML, human-readable, and then a “semantic cook” comes in and transforms it into whatever you want
Provides “Unix piping for the Web”:
Basically allows us to maintain everything (people, calendars, …) in a single format —HTML— by “overloading” the HTML markup elements such as span, class, …
Speaker: Greg Stein
Up now:
Coming soon:
Speaker: Schuyler Erle
Using MetaCarta technology for nothing (or close to).
Speaker: Frank Mantek
http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/
Technorati Tags: EuroOSCON, EuroOSCON06, EuroOSCON2006
These are the notes I’ve taken during the tutorials on the first day of the 2006 edition of the O’Reilly European Open Source Convention (better known as EuroOSCON 2006).
You can get to the index page for my notes on this conference here.
Speaker: John Paul Ashenfelter
It is mandatory to talk to everyone involved and make them agree (or at least understand what they consider) to the common terms. Each person may have a different idea of what something like an “order” means. You must make them agree to a single, common definition.
Metadata is king!
Most of the work is business stuff, not technical…
Dimension tables may be huge (as in tens or maybe even more than 100 columns). This is normal even if it feels really wrong to the database guy in us and the benefits are worth it. In this case “redundant is good”.
Federated tables exist since MySQL 5.0.3 and provide “link”-like access between tables.
“Archive” table type (engine ?) compresses the data on the fly with zlib. It is extremely bad for data warehousing usage because every search implies a full-table scan as there it implements no indexes.
UUID() function - may be used instead of a simple sequence and generates universally unique IDs.
PostgreSQL has an OLAP engine (table type?) and so it may be more interesting than MySQL for some types of usage.
Speaker: Kathy Sierra
People are only passionate if they are really good at it. Passion creates a higher resolution experience (passionate people experience things much deeper and get a whole lot more out of things they’re passionate about)
The goal: try to get the users through the following milestones as fast as possible: beginner (sucks), regular (OK), expert (passionate, high-resolution experience). One big problem is that regular users tend to stay there, tend not to upgrade (makes them get back in the beginner “suck” zone) and companies tend to think it is OK to have most users as regular users
People are/become passionate about the goal (making images, skiing, …), not the tool (photoshop, the skis, …). “What can I do with this” vs “How do I use this”
Creating passionate users does not necessarily mean that you mak them kick ass in your product. You can teach/help them get better at something tangentially related to your product and if they get really good at it, they’ll end up being passionate about your product. See “Misattribution of arousal” (the brain relates a good/bad feeling to everything that’s related to the experience —the whole context— not just to the thing/action itself)
The brain’s irracional “crap filter” still thinks that things like programming languages, subjects, etc are really not important, for it the really important things are saving our live from tigers or reproducing.
What does the brain care about?
What does the brain not care and forget?
So you have to link things that the brain cares about to the things you want it to pay attention to
Simple example: “conversational beats formal” every time! Why? There is no definite answer to that question yet, but the current hypothesis is that when the tone is conversational the brain is tricked into thinking that he is taking part in a conversation and he is wired to participate in it and so it pays attention
You need to talk to the brain, not just the mind
Create a compelling “vision” for what it will feel like when the user is kicking ass in it’s activity. “Why is it worth going through the pain of being a novice and regular user until I get to expert user?”. Before the user uses the product he must know why that is cool
Is there a clear path to being an expert user? Are we helping them getting there? Do they see that there is a path and a way?
“Why?”, “Who cares?” “So what?”: when you answer all those questions you can answer your user’s questions about why they should use your application/product
Documentation and information transference:
If users are to become power users then they have to stay with it. We must try to keep them interested, get them and keep them as much as possible in a flow state
The flow state (“I’m in the flow!”) requires a linear relationship between challenge and knowledge and skill
Many things create arousal in the brain (discovery, challenge, narrative, growth, thrill, sensation, …)
We must not break the flow of the users. We must enchant the users and keep them enchanted.
What breaks the flow? Microsoft Bob, complicated dials, weird menus…
Create a continuing challenge to the users, creating “levels” (or making them very explicit if they already exists implicitly) so that they can see and feel their evolution
User Experience Spiral: Interaction -> Payoff -> Motivation benefit -> Back to Interaction
The Tribe: passionate users create “tribes” that they feel proud of announcing to the world that they belong to. T-shirt first development (make sure you have ways for your users to state their tribe)
Giving users something to talk about. Easter eggs, The Dark Side Of The Rainbow… Give experienced users some knowledge that makes them “something more” than others. “Insider information” is social currency.
Community: Passion builds community and community builds passion.
Technorati Tags: EuroOSCON, EuroOSCON06, EuroOSCON2006
These are the notes I’ve taken during and about the 2006 edition of the O’Reilly European Open Source Convention (better known as EuroOSCON 2006).
They are really just unstructured tidbits to help me recall things latter on, when I’m going over the materials, but it may have some sort of value for someone else…
Technorati Tags: EuroOSCON, EuroOSCON06, EuroOSCON2006